The Truth About IPP Sentences

NSPCC and protection charities receive £21 million from National Lottery players

Lottery grants require more scrutiny

Lottery grants require more scrutiny can reveal that so far this year, 235 grants from the National Lottery have been made to charities dealing with public protection and sexual abuse to a total value of £21,307,631. Individual grants range from as little as £3,000 to several million, the larger grants sometimes being split between different sections of the same organisation, thus hiding the total amount awarded.

Although many are small organisations, others such as Childline, Kidscape and other well know charities are expensively housed in London and have corporate management structures which cost a fortune and drain public contributions to pay for staff with relatively little being left for the children that they purport to protect.

The NSPCC alone has received nearly £4 million from lottery funds despite the fact that is already receives government grants, bequests, celebrity donations and millions given to it by an unsuspecting public that thinks that all the money goes to children whereas in reality, the majority goes to pay for inflated salaries and the lavish expenditure of the organisation.

The total amount given from the National Lottery Good Causes fund has been split between different organisations that are part of or affiliated to the NSPCC. This way, the total amount is hidden from public view unless someone takes the trouble to go through all the available data.

This is all very worrying and there are further anomalies. Furthermore, one has to ask why it is that the NSPCC admits to having Statutory Duties which effectively make it part of the government yet, contrary to any other branch of government, it is entitled to tout for donations from the public and has charitable status.

One should not concentrate solely on one organisation however as there are many others who are part of what is seen by many to be a “gravy train”. had considerable difficulty trying to find the information database which tables the lottery grants given to organisations. We asked the National Lottery for a list of charities connected with child protection and sexual abuse and for the amount given to them.  They told us it was nothing to do with them.

We were then passed to the offices of the National Lottery Good Causes who also told us that the grants were nothing to do with them.

It was very clear that no one really wanted to answer our question but in the end – and only after we suggested that we would have to publish the fact that nobody wanted to release the figures – we ended up at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, having been given the run-around by everyone else.

No wonder others have given up trying to find out where the money really goes.

The UK National lottery only gives 50% of players’ money in prizes, the lowest in Europe. 12% goes to the government, ticket sellers get 6%, 4% goes on running costs and a massive 28% goes to good causes. org is not concerned with the fact that so much goes to good causes; it is the individual amounts that concern us and the fact that massive charitable status organisations like the NSPCC have become a bottomless pit into which millions of lottery players unknowingly throw millions of pounds every year.

We are therefore happy to publish the obscure link for the database and readers can check the grants for themselves by going to: but before they do so, readers should also consider some important points:

The child protection industry in the UK is huge and the largest in the world relative to population with some 2,000,000 people being involved in some way or another. There are also hundreds of other, small organisations dealing with what are termed “survivors” of sexual abuse.

Whilst most of the smaller organisations were started by individuals following up on their own experiences or those of their families and with perfectly respectable ideals, many have grown and now employ people at some considerable cost and must therefore make a profit.

The result is that much of the money donated goes towards paying for the charity itself and only ever-diminishing amounts go towards those who most need help. Some organisations such as the NSPCC, Childline, Barnados, Kidscape and others, have become huge money machines with chief executives being paid as much as £200,000 per year and have a whole corporate management structure that costs a fortune to maintain.

As a result, very little is left for those that the public believes will be the recipients of their donations.

For example, take a look at the NSPCC Annual Report for 2011 and you will see pictures of happy children and accounts of success. Look past that facade though and go into the guts of the report and you will see where the money goes in the figures that are displayed. (The report is available at:

Don’t be fooled either by words like “Education” which can also include such activities as research carried out on behalf of the governments, inquiries into cases, treatment of sex offenders and so on. is not for one moment suggesting that charities dealing with emotive issues should not receive lottery grants; nor are we suggesting that valuable organisations that do a good job should not be supported.

What we are suggesting however is that much greater scrutiny should be exercised over how much is given to which charity or group, particularly when it comes to those that operate in fields which cause the public and politicians to be afraid to question or argue with the amounts being given.

Nobody in the UK will ever argue against anything to do with dealing with child protection, rape, abuse of women or sexual abuse. Whilst this is perfectly understandable, the reasons sometime include a measure of fear; fear of criticism for daring to speak out.

As a result, some child abuse and rape charities have become little more than a licence to print money for those that run them and work within them. Whilst MPs make political capital from the suffering of others, those in the protection industry and in the charitable organisations that support them are making capital of a different kind – money.

To be fair, it is not the National Lottery that allocates the grants; that is done by the government (DCMS) and money is now going to the NHS, community projects and other causes that really should be paid for out of the public purse but which could be justified as being worthy of a lottery grant.

Successive governments have hidden behind lottery grants for years and have avoided increasing taxes by taking money from the good causes fund to pay for facilities that should be paid for by government.

What one has to remember though is that everyone in the chain gets paid, whether they work for the government, the charities or the public protection authorities – and they are all interlinked.

The scope for fraud or dishonesty is very broad indeed and any wrong doing would be immediately hidden from public view. believes that organisations such as the NSPCC should not have Statutory Duties, should not work on behalf of government and should not receive massive grants from the National Lottery.

We believe that charitable organisations working on behalf of children, working with those who have been abused or working on behalf of people who are vulnerable need to be seen as beyond reproach, lean and efficient.

We do not believe that charities should have a top-heavy, corporate management structure and expensive offices; nor should they use public guilt to support a leech-like mentality when it comes to sucking money out of the pockets of hard-working taxpayers.

Some years ago, OXFAM was heavily criticised for the way it operated but eventually put its house in order. The result was that giving by the public went up.

We suggest that all charities working in the field of public protection, children, sexual abuse and the protection of vulnerable individuals should also be purged.

Purged of those who see their organisation as a way of making a very comfortable living; purged of those who feed their own egos and place themselves above others and purged of those who would create empires and fiefdoms by using guilt to extract money from a gullible public and then, in some cases, using that money to do work that should rightly be done by government.

(Discuss this further in our Forum)

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 Responses to NSPCC and protection charities receive £21 million from National Lottery players

  1. Neal
    August 29, 2012 at 2:43 pm

    When I hear about the money that goes to these organisations it sickens me to the stomach.

    Let me recount an incident that happen to me 6 years ago when I caught a flight from Bangkok. I was seated next to a lady who engaged me in conversation. She turned out to be a well known child ‘protection’ campaigner who received considerable sums from the government.

    From my questioning it appeared most money was spent on her attending ‘conferences’ in Asia with her staying at 5 star hotels.

    When i mentioned a number of names-charity workers and the odd Catholic priest I know and a French doctor who cares for Thai kids who have AIDs in the north of Thailand, she condemned them as ‘potential pedos’ and so on. As the flight wore on she got drunk and attempted to kiss me and grabbed my crutch.

    For the first time in my life I felt terrified-hemmed in as I was on a plane. I asked the flight attendants to move me and they were reluctant due to a full flight until I told them i would sue the airline for seating me next to an abuser. I was moved to first class with much reluctance.

    Since then I have watched as this ‘child protection’ advocate has made all sorts of bizarre claims about English ‘predators’ and so on flooding Asia and demanding those who have been previously arrested must have their passports removed and so on.

    The French doctor I know- I send him around 20 pounds a month-every penny I send, as do a few hundred others, goes to care for Asia kids with AIDs. He happens to be personally wealthy and this is his way of giving something back.

    The person I sat next to- not one single penny she receives actually goes to help a child in need. Not one single penny.

    Yet she is still quoted in newspapers with outrageous claims. When the Boxing Day Tsunami devastated Asia in 2004 she sent out text messages claiming ‘pedos’ had flooded Sri Lanka and Thailand looking for homeless kids.

    Several police forces had to quickly deny the claim as ludicrous.

    Now-anyone in any organisation claiming to be a ‘child protection’ advocate , to me is suspect.

    • Jenny
      August 29, 2012 at 2:58 pm

      This so called “lady” wouldn’t have anything to do with that self-serving outfit ECPAT by any chance would she?

      She pays herself extremely well!

  2. bobjob
    August 29, 2012 at 10:50 am

    I have noticed that whenever you publish an article dealing with child protection, there are nearly always less comments than usual. I think this is because people are afraid to comment for fear of being traced and criticised.

    If we have got to that stage in this country where ordinary people are afraid to speak out about the rip off that these big charities are, then there is no hope left.

  3. Mike
    August 28, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    It always has been a way to leach money. Charity relies on a lot of volunteers while the managers get a really good screw. I would not give one penny to any of them.

  4. Richard McMillan
    August 28, 2012 at 3:08 pm

    I knew that money went to Charities but when you learn about that is actually used for the charity aims and the size of the organisational structures, there are major causes for concern.
    as an aside, what are the role of the Charity Commission?

  5. Angus
    August 28, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    Well, they certainly kept that one quiet. When i asked, they told me the list was not available!

    I shall never play the UK lottery again. There are plenty of other alternatives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SPAM protection: Please fill in the missing number... Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.